Vanguard, a leading American investment management company, has recently made headlines with its decision not to support U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on its brokerage platform. This move, reported by The Wall Street Journal on January 11, aligns with Vanguard’s traditional investment focus on equities, bonds, and cash, which it considers the cornerstone of a balanced, long-term portfolio.

Founded in 1975 by John C. Bogle, Vanguard is renowned for its low-cost mutual funds and ETFs. Its unique mutual ownership structure, where the company is owned by its funds and, in turn, by their investors, has been a key factor in aligning its interests with those of its clients, often resulting in lower fees. Vanguard has been a significant advocate of passive investing strategies, emphasizing long-term, low-cost investing in broad market indices.

The company’s decision to exclude spot Bitcoin ETFs from its offerings has led to some investors reconsidering their association with Vanguard. Notable figures like Coinbase’s senior engineering manager Yuga Cohler and Bitcoin commentator Neil Jacobs have expressed intentions to move their investments to other platforms like Fidelity, which supports Bitcoin ETFs.

The Wall Street Journal report also sheds light on how other investment firms are approaching the new spot Bitcoin ETFs. Firms like Citi, Merrill Lynch, Edward Jones, and UBS have imposed similar restrictions, with UBS considering these ETFs for aggressive investors and Citi making them available to institutional clients. JPMorgan, on the other hand, has made spot Bitcoin ETF trading accessible on its platform but with a risk disclosure for investors.

Earlier today, Eric Balchunas, a Senior ETF Analyst at Bloomberg, shared a thought-provoking thread on social media platform X, dissecting Vanguard’s decision not to support U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Balchunas’ Analysis:

  1. Vanguard’s Growth vs. Bitcoin’s Market Cap: Balchunas began by highlighting Vanguard’s significant growth, which surpassed Bitcoin’s entire market capitalization last year. This comparison underscores Vanguard’s immense influence and success in the investment world, despite its absence in the cryptocurrency space.
  2. Shared Anti-Wall Street Ethos: Balchunas pointed out the common ground between Vanguard and the crypto community – both harbor an anti-Wall Street sentiment. Vanguard, under the leadership of its founder John C. Bogle, has always maintained a populist stance, challenging traditional Wall Street practices. This mirrors the crypto community’s ethos, which often positions itself as an alternative to conventional financial systems.
  3. Investment Discipline: He also drew parallels in investment discipline, noting that both Vanguard investors and the crypto community exhibit a ‘navy seals-level’ of discipline in their investment approach. This disciplined, long-term perspective is a trait shared by both groups, despite their different investment focuses.
  4. Resilience in Market Downturns: Balchunas observed that Vanguard investors typically don’t panic during market downturns, such as a 10% drop. Instead, they continue to invest and focus on long-term goals. He suggested that the crypto community, known for its volatility, could learn from this steady approach.
  5. Influence on Bitcoin ETF Fees: Perhaps most significantly, Balchunas credited Vanguard’s spirit and influence for the reduction in Bitcoin ETF fees to 20-30 basis points. He argued that Vanguard’s legacy of low-cost investing has set a benchmark that other issuers in the Bitcoin ETF space have had to follow, even though Vanguard itself is not a direct competitor.

Featured Image via Pixabay